Sometimes
demolition is also the reason for changing history. It is 1986. Sanathi
(Sannati) is on the banks of the Bhima river in Gulberg district of Karnataka.
There is a temple at Sanathi. The temple has an idol of Chandralamba Devi.
One day the roof of the temple collapsed and fell on the idol. The statue broke, the floor was also broken and a new history emerged.
Four inscriptions of Ashoka emerge from the ruins of the temple. The temple floor and foundation were made from these inscriptions. One of these inscriptions was used as a statue post.
Then the archeology department started digging in the surrounding area. A great Buddhist India emerged. Big Mahastupa ... Many votive stupas ... Chaityagriha ... Many standing Buddha statues ... Dhamma Chakra ... Hundreds of Brahmi inscriptions ... Marking of Jataka tales ... Coins ... Railings The ruins of ... many !!!
That means many temples were built to suppress the Buddhist civilization and its history.
History tells that Ashoka emperor had constructed 84000 stupas. 84,000 stupas built by emperor Ashoka, Chaitya, Vaheer also built with stones have disappeared. Reading is not allowed (Indus Valley), so that the reality does not come in the way
Rather, history is taught upside down, Muslim rulers destroyed the Buddha site and Buddhist
If a Buddhist stupa and a temple were broken by a Muslim ruler, how could a Hindu temple be built on it?
Were Muslim rulers breaking Hindu sites and building Hindu temples? How is it possible? History tells us that King Sugam built numerous temples, meaning many temples were built to suppress the Buddhist civilization and its history. So did Raja Sugam build the temples from the contents of the Buddha sites? There is many more such evidence today that how a great era was erased, but the truth sometimes comes down to thatch.
If the archeology department knows everything, then what is the reason for keeping the constitutional department like archeology hidden? Who is responsible for teaching wrong history to the students?
